Documents illustrative of the Canadian constitution

chronology

“The events recorded in the left hand column belong to the history of what is now British America; those in the right hand column belong for the most part to this history of what is now the United States:

1492First Voyage of Columbus
1497Cabot discovered Newfoundland
First Voyage of Jacques Cartier1534
Second Voyage of Jacques Cartier1535
Third Voyage of Jacques Cartier1541
1542De Soto discovers the Mississippi
1564French settlement in Florida
Gilbert in Newfoundland1583
1584Raleigh’s first voyage (Virginia)
1606London and Plymouth charter
1607Jamestown (Virginia), founded
Quebec founded by De Champlain1608
Fourth voyage of De Champlain1610Discovery of Hudson River
Fifth voyage of De Champlain1611Discovery of Hudson Bay
Sixth voyage of De Champlain, and ascent of the Ottawa1613
1614New Amsterdam founded
De Champlain at the Georgian Bay1615
1619First Legislative Assembly in America (Virginia)
Tenth voyage of De Champlain1620Landing of “Pilgraims” at Cape Cod and at Plymouth
Nova Scotia granted to Sir William Alexander by James I1621Dutch West India Company
1623New Hampshire settled
“One Hundred Associates”1627
Quebec taken by Sir David Kirke1629Massachusetts charter
1630First General Court of Massachusetts
Canada and Acadia restored to France by the Treaty of St. Germain-en-Lye1632Maryland granted to Calvert
Twelfth voyage of De Champlain (first “Governor” of Canada)1633
Death of De Champlain1635First Assembly of Maryland
De Montmagny Governor [of Canada]1636Roger Williams in Providence
1636Harvard College formed
1639First written constitution in America adopted by Connecticut, and first General Court of the Province
Settlement of Montreal1642Charter granted to Rhode Island
1643New England Confederacy
D’Ailleboust, Governor of Canada1648Treaty of Westphalia
De Lauson, Governor [of Canada]1651
1652Maine annexed to Massachusetts
D’Argenson, Governor [of Canada]1658Indian war at Esopus
Bishop Laval at Quebec1659Quakers hanged at Boston
D’Avangour, Governor [of Canada]1660
Colbert, Prime Minister of France1661
1662Charter granted to Connecticut
“Sovereign Council” established with De Mesy as Governor of “New France”1663Rhode Island charter
Seminary of St. Sulpice acquire Montreal1663
De Tracy Viceroy, and De Courcelles Governor [of Canada]1664New York taken by the British
West India Company granted Monopoly of Canadian trade1664Connecticut and New Haven united
Iroquois country invaded1666
Bay of Quinte Seminary mission1668First Assembly of New Jersey
1669First Assembly of North Carolina
Hudson Bay Company chartered1670Charleston South Carolina founded
1672
1673Mississippi discovered by Joliet and Marquette
Laval Bishop of Quebec1674First Assembly of South Carolina
De la Salle visits France1674New Netherlands (New York), New Jersey and Delaware ceded to Britain by Holland
Reduction of tithe to one-twenty-sixth1679First Assembly in New Hampshire
Indian Council at Montreal1680De la Salle on the Illinois
De la Barre Governor [of Canada]1682Penn founds Pennsylvania
1682De la Salle descends the Mississippi
1684The Mississippi Company established
De Denonville Governor [of Canada]1685
Hudson Bay forts taken1686Andros Governor of Massachusetts
Departure of Bishop Laval1688New York annexed to New England
Massacre of Lachine1689William III King of England
De Frontenac Governor [of Canada]1689Andros expelled from Massachusetts
Quebec attacked by Phips1690New Hampshire annexed to Massachusetts
1697Treaty of Ryswick
Death of De Frontenac1698
De Calieres Governor [of Canada]1699Penn visits America
Indian Treaty of Peace (Montreal)1701New charter for Pennsylvania
1702War of Spanish succession
De Vaudreuil Governor [of Canada]1703
“Superior Council” created1703
Capture of Port Royal (Annapolis) [Nova Scotia]1710Hunter Governor of New York
Expedition of Walker and Hill against Quebec1711
1712Crozat’s Mississippi Charter
1713Treaty of Utrecht
Nicholson Governor of [Nova Scotia]1714George I, King of Great Britain
Death of Louis XIV1715
Phillips Governor of [Nova Scotia]1717Law’s Mississippi charter
1718New Orlean’s founded
Louisburg fortified1720Burnet Governor by New York
1722Fort Oswego built by Burnet
Armstrong governor of [Nova Scotia]1723Paper money in Pennsylvania
Fort Niagara rebuilt1725
De Beauharnois Governor of Canada1726
1727George II King of England
Newfoundland a British Province1728
1731Crown Point occupied by the French
1732Louisiana made a Royal Province
1733Georgia Settled
Iron forges at Three Rivers1737
Verandrye ascends the Red River1738New Jersey separated from New York
Mascarene Governor of [Nova Scotia]1740
Louisburg captured1745
De la Galissonniere Governor of Canada1747
De la Jonquiere Governor of Canada1748Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle
Halifax [Nova Scotia] founded1749Slaves admitted to Georgia
Cornwallis Governor of [Nova Scotia]1749
Fort Rouille built at Toronto1749De Celeron’s Ohio expedition
Hopson governor of [Nova Scotia]1752
Duquesne Governor of Canada1752
Lawrence Governor of [Nova Scotia]1753Osborn Governor of New York
1754First Assembly of Georgia
1754Interprovincial Congress at Albany
Expatriation of the Acadians1755Braddock’s Expedition to Fort du Quense
De Vaudreuil Governor of Canada1755Dieskau defeated at Fort George
First Assembly of Nova Scotia1758Abercrombie defeated at Fort Ticonderoga
Quebec taken by Wolfe1759Niagara taken by Johnston
Montreal taken by Amherst1760George III, King of Great Britain
Province of Quebec created1763Treaty of Paris
1763
1765The Stamp Act passed
Carleton Governor of Quebec1766Repeal of the Stamp Act
Prince Edward Island made a Province1769Pontiac killed
1769Colonial Tax Act passed
First Assembly of Prince Edward Island1773Destruction of tea at Boston
Lord Mansfield’s judgement1774Boston port closed
The Quebec Act passed1774First Revolutionary Congress, (Philadelphia)
Montgomery and Arnold invade Canada1775Battle of Lexington
1776Declaration of Independence
Haldimand Governor of Quebec1778Articles of Confederation
1778Colonial Tax Act repealed
Immigration of United Empire loyalists1783Treaties of Paris and Versailles
New Brunswick made a Province1784
Lord Dorchester Governor of Quebec1786Cotton introduced into Georgia
1787Constitution of the United States
1789George Washington, President
Constitutional Act passed1791
First Parliaments of Upper and Lower Canada1792Washington made the capital
1794The Jay Treaty (London)
Prescott Governor of Canada1796Washington’s retirement
Second Parliament of Upper Canada (York)1797John Adams, President
1801Thomas Jefferson, President
Selkirk’s Colony in Prince Edward Island1803Louisiana ceded by France
Craig Governor of Canada1806Lewis and Clark reach the Pacific
1809James Madison, President
Prevost Governor of Canada1811
Selkirk’s settlers at Red River1812War declared against Britain
1814Treaty of Ghent
Sherbrooke Governor of Canada1816
1817James Monroe, President
Richmond Governor of Canada1818Convention of London
1819Florida purchased from Spain
Dalhousie Governor of Canada1820Maine admitted as a State
Cape Breton annexed to Nova Scotia1820Missouri compromise
1825John Quincy Adams, President
Canada Company formed1826
1829Andrew Jackson, President
Aylmer Governor of Canada1830First railway in the United States
Revenue Control Act1831
First Assembly in Newfoundland1832
Gosford Governor of Canada1835
1837Victoria Queen of Britain
Rebellion in Canada1837Martin Van Buren, President
Lower Canadian Constitution Suspended1838
Durham Governor of British America1838
Sydenham Governor of the Canadas1839
Union Act1840
Sydenham Governor of Canada1841William H. Harrison, President
First Parliament of Canada1841John Tyler, President
Responsible Government introduced1842
Bagot Governor of Canada1842Ashburn Treaty (Washington)
Matcalfe Governor of Canada1843
Great fire in Quebec City1845James Knox Polk, President
Elgin Governor of Canada1846War with Mexico
1848Treaty with Mexico
Rebellion losses agitation1849Zachary Taylor, President
1850Willard Filmore, President
1850Fugitive Slave Bill
Gavazzi Riots in Montreal1853Franklin Pierce, President
Clergy Reserves secularized1854Reciprocity Treaty (Washington)
Feudal tenure abolished1854Kansas-Nebraska Bill passed
Head Governor of Canada1855Kansas riots
1857James Buchanan, President
1857“Dred Scot” case
Canadian Federation mooted1859Harper’s Ferry uprising
The Anderson (fugitive slave) case1860
Monck Governor of Canada1861War of Secession begun
1861Abraham Lincoln, President
Self governing Colonies made responsible for their own defence1862The Alabama sails from Liverpool
Colonial Habeas Corpus Act1862
Quebec Conference1864
Colonial Laws Validity Act1865Andrew Johnson, President
Fenian Raids1866
Confederation Act1867
Lisgar Governor of Canada1868
Northwest Territories acquired1869Ulysses S. Grant, President
Province of Manitoba1870
British Columbia added to Canada1871Treaty of Washington
Dufferin Governor of Canada1872
1877Rutherford B. Hayes, President
Lorne Governor of Canada1878
Canadian Pacific Railway organized1881James A. Garfield, President
1881Chester A. Arthur, President
Landowne Governor of Canada1883
Northwest rebellion suppressed1885Grover Cleveland, President
Stanley Governor of Canada1888
1889Benjamin Harrison, President

“NOTES TO THE TREATY OF UTRECHT:

  1. The text is reprinted from the “ Collection of Treaties between Great Britain and other powers,” published by George Chalmers at London in 1790. In that collection the Treaty of Utrecht is, according to the compiler, “printed from the copy which was published by authority in 1713.”
  2. The two dates here given are according to the Old Style and the New Style ; the latter had been adopted by France in 1582, and it was not adopted in England till 1751.
  3. For the Charter of the Hudson Bay Company see Ontario Sessional Papers, vol, xi, No. 31.
  4. The boundary was never determined by the commissaries appointed under the Treaty of Utrecht (Ont, Sess. Papers, vol. xi. No. 31, p. 136 p.), and it remained un- settled until Canada became a British Province. There was then no pressing reason for defining it, and it remained undetermined until it was defined by the Imperial Act of 1889, 52 & 53 Vict. cap 28, which settled the northern boundary of Ontario.
  5. These ancient boundaries are thus given by Murdoch in his “History of Nova Scotia or Acadia”: “Acadia was then bounded on the north by the Gulf of St. Lawrence, on the east by the Atlantic, on the south by the river Kennebec, and on the west by the Province of Canada, its northwesternmost boundary being in Gaspe Bay.” Thus defined, Acadia included the present Provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and part of the State of Maine. The St. Croix river is named as the boundary, instead of the Kennebec, in the Commission to Walter Paterson. Prince Edward Island, in 1769, and this definition is repeated in the Commission to Thomas Carleton. the first Governor of New Brunswick, in 1781. (See Dominion of Canada Sessional Papers, vol. xvi. No. 70.) For an account of disputes between the French of Acadia and the British Colonists of New England over the district between these two rivers, see Kingsford’s “History of Canada,” Murdoch’s “ History of Nova Scotia,” and the volume of “Selections” mentioned in Note 6.
  6. Governor Philipps was instructed, in 1729, to appoint Commissioners to confer with Commissioners appointed by the Governor of Canada as to the boundaries of Acadia. This was never done, and for correspondence on the subject see “Selections from the Public Documents of the Province of Nova Scotia,” Halifax, 1869. Gov. Philipps’ instructions are given in the Dom. Sess. Papers, Vol. xvi, No. 70.
  7. Compare the provisions of this treaty respecting fishing privileges with those reserved to France in the Treaty of Paris, 1763. See also the provisions in the Treaty of Versailles, 1783, relating to the same franchises; and the provisions of the Treaty of Paris, 1783, the Treaty of Ghent, 1814, the Convention of 1818, and the Treaty of Washington, 1871, dealing with the claims of the United States to the Canadian fisheries. For these documents see Appendix A.
  8. This right was exercised in the case of Louisburg, which was made the centre of French operations in Acadia. Cape Breton was finally ceded to Great Britain by the Treaty of Paris, 1763.
  9. Compare the concessions made in the articles of capitulation of Montreal, 1760; in the Treaty of Paris, 1763; in the Quebec Act, 1774; and in the Constitutional. Act, 1791.”

Houston, William. “Documents illustrative of the Canadian constitution” Toronto : Carswell, 1891″ https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001144305

Draught of H.M. Commission to Richard Philips to be Governor of Placentia and Cap. General and Governor in Chief of Nova Scotia or Accadie, June 19 1719

The document, addressed to the Lords Justices, discusses the governance and development of the Province of Placentia and Nova Scotia. It highlights the unique circumstances of the province, noting that it has not been previously settled by British subjects. Consequently, the instructions for Colonel Philips, who is appointed as governor, draw heavily from those provided to the Governor of Virginia. These instructions aim to establish a new settlement, focusing on population growth, promoting the fishery industry, preserving timber for the Royal Navy, and encouraging the production of naval stores like hemp.

Colonel Philips is directed to maintain friendly relations with the Governor of Canada and French subjects, while also keeping a vigilant eye on French activities in neighboring territories. Additionally, there is emphasis on fostering goodwill with the indigenous Mi’kmaq people, including proposing intermarriages between British subjects and Mi’kmaq individuals to strengthen ties.

The instructions touch upon various aspects of governance, including encouraging settlement, regulating land grants, promoting the fishery industry, and ensuring the welfare of soldiers stationed in the region. There’s also a focus on transitioning inhabitants from Newfoundland to Nova Scotia for the colony’s development.

Overall, the instructions aim to establish a viable governance structure, promote economic growth, and secure British interests in the region amidst competition from other European powers.


255. Council of Trade and Plantations to the Lords Justices. Enclose following. Continue: The Province [of Placentia and Nova Scotia] not being hitherto peopled or settled by H.M. subjects, we did not think it necessary, that either the Commission or Instructions for Col. Philips should be so extensive, as those for H.M. other Governors, in America etc. But for Col. Philips better Government, in addition to these Instructions, we have thought it necessary, that he should have with him, a copy of H.M. Instructions to His Governor of Virginia, which may be of use to him so far as they shall be applicable to cases that may happen and are not sufficiently provided for by these instructions, till H.M. further pleasure shall be known.

Your Excellencies will perceive that the Instructions we have prepared for Col. Philips, are entirely calculated for the laying out and making a new settlement, wherein we have made the best provision we are able to propose at present for the peopling of the country, for promoting the fishery, for the preservation of the timber fit for ye Royal Navy and for encouraging the productn. of Naval Stores, more particularly of hemp, which is very much wanted in H.M. Dominions. There is a clause in the said Instructions whereby the Govr. is directed to live in perfect friendship and good correspondence with the Governor of Canada and all officers and other subjects of his Most Christian Majesty in those parts, and to avoid as far as in him lies all occasions of dispute or contention with them. But at the same time, considering how formidable the French already are there, and how much reason there is to be jealous of their new settlements and extent of territory on the back of the British Plantations from ye Gulph and River of St. Lawrence down by the Lakes and the River Missisipi to the Bay of Mexico, we have prepared an Instruction directing Col. Philips to keep a watchful eye upon them, and to transmit from time to time the best accounts he can get of their proceedings. And as we are convinced from all the accounts that we have received from America, that nothing has so much contributed to strengthen the hands of the French in those parts, as the friendship they maintain, and the intermarriages they make with the [Mi’kmaq] we have not only prepared a clause in his said Instructions, requiring him to give all civil and friendly treatment to the [indigenous] Nations or clans within his Governmt., but have likewise taken the liberty to propose an Instruction for encouraging of intermarriages between H.M. subjects and the said [Mi’kmaq] , which we hope may have a very good effect there, and can occasion but a small expence to H.M. We were the rather induced to offer this Instruction because of ye weak condition Nova Scotia is in at present, being only inhabited by French planters, who have hitherto refused to take the oaths to H.M. and by the [Mi’kmaq] , who are very much influenced by the French Missionaries; to which may be added that this Province lies between the two French settlements of Cape Breton and Canada, where they are very strong and numerous, and daily encroaching upon H.M. territories in those parts. We think it highly necessary that a reservation should be made of certain tracts of land in proper places to be set apart for the production and preservation of timber for the use of the Royal Navy, and as we have proposed in the said Instructions, that the Govr. shall make no grants, till the country shall have been survey’d; we humbly offer that the Surveyor General of the Woods on the Continent of America have directions forthwith to repair to Nova Scotia, and mark out such parts thereof as are proper to be reserved for this purpose agreeable to the said Instruction. We have likewise prepared and herewith lay before your Excellencies another draught of Instructions for Col. Philips, which relate only to ye observance of the several Laws of Trade and Navigation, and are in the usual form etc. Repeat proposal for a ship to attend the Province etc.; “for in our humble opinion it will be impossible for Col. Philips either to protect the trade and fishery of H.M. subjects there, or to put the greatest part of his Instructions in execution, without such an assistance.” Annexed.

255. i. Draught of H.M. Commission to Richard Philips to be Governor of Placentia and Cap. General and Governor in Chief of Nova Scotia or Accadie. To appoint a Council not exceeding the number of 12, levy forces, grant lands under a moderate quit-rent, and “do execute and perform all and every such further act and acts as shall or may tend or conduce to the security of our said Province, and the good people thereof and to the honour of our Crown,” etc.

255. ii. Draught of H.M. Instructions to Governor Philips.

1-8. Usual Instructions as to Councillors.

(ix). And the better to enable H.M. to compleat what may be further wanting towards the establishing a civil Governmt. in the said Province, you are to give unto H.M. by one of his principal Secretaries of State, and to the Commissioners for Trade and Plantations, by the first opportunity after your arrival there, a true state of the said Province, particlarly with respect to the number and qualifications of the people that either are there, or hereafter shall resort thither, of what number it may be proper to constitute an Assembly? What persons are proper and fit to be judges, justices or sherrifs? and any other matter or thing, that may be of use to H.M. in the establishing a civil Government as aforesaid.

(x) In the meantime till such a Governmt. shall have been established you will receive herewith a copy of the Instructions given to the Governor of Virginia, by which you will conduct yourself, till H.M. further pleasure shall be known, as near as the circumstance of the place will admit, in such things as they can be applicable to, and where you are not otherwise directed by these Instructions. But you are not to take upon you to enact any laws till H.M. shall have appointed an Assembly and given you directions for your proceedings therein.

(xi) Whereas we are informed that the inhabitants of Nova Scotia (except those of the Garrison of Annapolis Royal) are most if not all of them French, who never took the oaths of fidelity and allegiance to H.M., or to the late Queen; notwithstanding such their undutiful behaviour, you are immediately upon your arrival there, to invite them in the most friendly manner by Proclamation and otherways, as you shall think fit to submit to your Government and swear allegiance to H.M., within the space of four months from the date of such your Proclamation, upon which condition, they shall enjoy the free exercise of their religion, and be protected in all their civil and religious rights and liberties so long as they shall behave themselves as becomes good subjects.

(xii) You shall take care to give notice to H.M. by one of his principal Secretaries of State and to the Comrs. for Trade and Plantations of the effect of this Proclamation and expect H.M. further orders thereupon for your conduct towards such of the sd. French inhabitants as shall not have comply’d therewith by the time therein prefix’d. But in the mean while, you are to observe that the sd. French inhabitants of Nova Scotia have long since lapsed the time, granted them by the Treaty of Utrecht, for removing their effects from thence to any part of the French Dominions in America; and therefore if any of the said French inhabitants should notwithstanding the encouragement given them to become good subjects to H.M. resolve to remove out of your Governmt. you are to take particular care as far as in you lies, that they do no damage, before such their removal to their respective houses and plantations, and that they be not permitted to carry off their effects with them.

(xii) And as it is not reasonable that such of the French inhabitants as shall neglect or refuse to take ye oaths of allegiance aforesaid, within ye time prefix’d, should enjoy ye same liberties and advantages with the rest of H.M. subjects in Nova Scotia, you are hereby directed, to debar them from fishing on the coast, till H.M. further pleasure be known concerning them.

(xiv) You are to send to H.M. by one of his principal Secretarys of State, and to the Comrs. for Trade and Plantations an accot. of the number of the said French inhabitants remaining in that Province; Where their settlements are? Whether they live in townships, or are scatter’d at distances from each other? What trade they carry on, either with the [Mi’kmaq] or otherwise? And how they employ themselves for the subsistance of their families? What number of ships they have? How they are employ’d? To what markets they carry the fish they catch? And what goods or commodities they bring back (and from what places) in return for their said fish? Also the like accounts with respect to such of H.M. natural born subjects, as are already setled in the said Province.

(xv) You shall after your arrival there propose to the Governor of Canada to appoint one or more Commissaries in behalf of ye French, to be joined with such as you shall appoint on H.M. part to view the limits between H.M. territories and those of France bordering on Nova Scotia pursuant to the Articles of the Treaty of Utrecht and to such further Instructions as you shall receive from hence for that purpose; and you shall send a full account of your proceedings herein to one of H.M. principal Secs. of State to be laid before H.M. and to the Comrs. for Trade and Plantations as aforesaid, with your opinion upon the whole.

(xvi) You shall live in good correspondence with the said Govr. and all other officers and subjects of the most Christian King, taking particular care that no violence be offer’d to them, whereby an occasion might be given to interrupt the friendship and good correspondence between the two Crowns, which more particularly in the present juncture. is so necessary for their mutual advantage, and in case the subjects of France should make any depredations upon those of H.M. or do them any other injury, you shall not make reprizals without further order from H.M., but you shall in an amicable manner demand redress of the Govr. of Canada, or such other officer as it may concern; But if it should so happen that he persist in justifying what such subjects of France may have done, and that either thro’ his obstinacy or the dubiousness of the case, you shall not be able to adjust the difference between yourselves, in a friendly manner, you shall represent the same to one of H.M. principal Secretaries of State, and to the Commissionrs. for Trade and Plantations to be laid before H.M., acquainting the said Govr. or other officer in the first place with your intention so to do, and offering to impart to him your represn. of the case if he will, in like manner communicate to you what he writes to the French Court upon that subject.

(xvii) You are notwithstanding to keep as strict a watch as possible upon the proceedings of the French at Cape Breton and in Canada and particularly you are to send to H.M. by one of his Secretaries of State and to the Commrs. for Trade and Plantations frequent accounts of their number, strength and situation—what commerce. they carry on—and what progress they have made in their settlement on the back of the British Plantations, especially with regard to the communication they are said to have opened from the Gulph and River of St. Lawrence to the Lakes of Ontario and Erie, and from thence down the River Missisipi to the Bay of Mexico.

(xviii) You shall to the utmost of your power encourage the growth and production of timber, masts, tar, hemp and other Naval Stores, in the Province of Nova Scotia, and you are to enquire, what trees there are in the said Province fit for masts for the use of the Royal Navy and in what parts of the country they grow at what distance they are from any rivers whereby they may be the more commodiously brought down, in order to be shipt for this Kingdom.

(xix) And you are in a particular manner to signify H.M. express will and pleasure to all the inhabitants that now are or hereafter shall come to settle there, and to take care yourself, that no trees fit for masts for the future, of the diameter of 24 inches and upwards at 12 inches from the ground be cut without H.M. particular licence.

(xx) You are to endeavour to get a survey made of the said Province of Nova Scotia as soon as conveniently may be; and in the mean time you are to send to H.M. by one of his principal Secretaries of State, and to the Commrs. for Trade and Plantations the best description of that country you are able to get, with relation to its extent and situation, with respect to ye neighbouring French of Canada and Cape Breton.

(xxi) You are also to send the most particular account you can of ye nature of the soil. What swamps there are in it? and whether those swamps do produce mast trees, or by drayning may not be made fit for raising of hemp? What other products the country is capable of? and how the same may best be improved for the advantage of this Kingdom? and what trade may be carried on with the [Mi’kmaq] for furrs and otherwise? What navigable rivers there are in ye said Province and what others fall into them?

(xxii) And whereas we have judged it highly necessary for H.M. service that you should cultivate and maintain a strict friendship and good correspondence with the [indigenous] Nations inhabiting within the precincts of your Governmt. that they may be reduced by degrees not only to be good neighbours to H.M. subjects. but likewise themselves become good subjects to H.M., we do therefore direct you upon your arrival in Nova Scotia to send for the several heads of the said [indigenous] Nations or clans, and promise them friendship and protection on H.M. part. You will likewise bestow on them, as your diseretion shall direct, such presents as you shall carry from hence in H.M. name for their use.

(xxiii) And as further mark of H.M. good will to the said [indigenous] Nations; you shall give all possible incouragement to intermarriages between H.M. British subjects and them for which purpose you are to declare in H.M. name, that H.M. will bestow on every white man being one of His subjects, who shall marry an [indigenous] woman, native and inhabitant of Nova Scotia, a free gift of the sum of £10 sterl. and 50 acres of land, free of quit rent for ye space of 20 years, and the like on any white woman being H.M. subject who shall marry an [indigenous] man, native and inhabitant of Nova Scotia, as aforesaid.

(xxiv) And whereas it will be of advantage to H.M. service and highly beneficial to the trade of Great Britain, that the said Province of Nova Scotia be peopled and settled as soon as conveniently may be; as an incouragemt. to all H.M. good subjects, that shall be disposed to settle themselves and their families there; you are hereby directed to make grants of such lands in fee simple as are not already disposed of by H.M., to any person that shall apply to you for the same; reserving nevertheless to H.M., his heirs and successors an annual rent of one shilling, or of three pound of hemp, clean, bright and water-rotted for every fifty acres so granted, at the election of the grantee; the said rent to commence three years after the making the grant, and not before; you are to take especial care, that there be a clause inserted in all ye said grants, declaring, that if any grantee shall refuse or neglect to pay the abovementioned rent for the space of three years, after ye same shall become due, his patent shall henceforth be null and void to all intents and purposes whatsoever,

(xxv) But as great inconveniencies have arisen from suffering one single Proprietor to possess too large tracts of land in H.M. Plantations. It is H.M. express will and pleasure, that for the better settling and peopling ye Collony under your Government, that you do not, upon any pretence whatsoever, grant unto any one person above the number of 500 acres; It being H.M. intention that no person whatsoever either in his own name or any others in trust for him, do hold any more than 500 acres as aforesaid until H.M. further pleasure shall be known thereupon. And in all such grants of land as you shall hereafter make; you are to have particular regard to the profitable and unprofitable acres, that is to say, that no man shall have his whole grant run lengthways upon the banks of a river, but that a due proportion of what shall be granted to him do run from ye river upwards into the country.

(xxvi) And whereas it is and hath been a common practice in H.M. Plantations in America for persons to take out patents for sundry tracts of land without being in any condition to cultivate the same; you are hereby directed to cause a clause to be inserted in every grant of land by you to be made, as aforesaid; whereby the said grant shall become void and null to all intents and purposes, if the grantee or his assigns do not cultivate, inclose, plant or improve at least one tenth part of the lands granted within the space of three year, to be accounted from the date of ye patent, and so progressively one other tenth part within the space of every other subsequent three years, until the whole tract of land contained in the said patent shall be cultivated, inclosed, planted or improved.

(xxvii) And that H.M. may at all times be exactly informed of the state of the Province, particularly with respect to the lands that shall be granted; you are to cause a book to be fairly kept wherein shall be registred all ye grants made by you specifying the names of the grantees, the number of acres granted, with their scituation and boundaries and the quit rents thereon reserv’d together with ye dates of each respective grant. And you are to transmit to H.M. by one of his principal Secretaries of State and to his Commissrs. for Trade and Plantations, transcripts of such registers at least once a year.

(xxviii) But as it is H.M. pleasure that certain tracts of land which shall be found upon a survey, to be most proper for producing of masts and other timber for the use of the Royal Navy, lying contiguous to the sea coast or navigable rivers, be reserved for H.M. service; you are not to grant any lands till such tracts shall have been marked out and set apart for H.M. use, not amounting to less than 200,000 acres in the whole, in which you shall strictly forbid all the inhabitants of Nova Scotia, or others that may come there, to cut any trees of any dimensions whatsoever, upon pain of H.M. highest displeasure and of the utmost penalties the Laws can inflict.

(xxix) It being H.M. intention to give all possible incouragement to the trade of all His subjects; you are to use your best endeavors that the fishery on the coast of Nova Scotia be encouraged and protected; and in order thereunto you shall not allow any settlements to be made on the coast, but what shall be at 200 yards distance from the sea or harbour, that there may be sufficient room left for beaches, flakes, stages, cook-rooms, and other necessary conveniencies between the said settlement and the sea, for any of H.M. subjects that shall come to catch and cure fish there, who are not to be impeded, molested or disturbed in their curing their fish, upon any pretence of grants or settlements upon the coast. Nor shall any of the planters and inhabitants demand any sum or sums of money or other acknowledgement from the fishermen for the liberty of curing upon the coast, unless they provide stages and cook-rooms with a shore man to each stage, and the usual necessaries for such fishing ships, as is done at Marblehead in New Engld. And in such case they shall ask no more than 12d. in New England money for every quintal.

(xxx) And to render the commerce of H.M. subjects in Nova Scotia, more commodious and practicable, you are to take especial care in all such grants of land as you shall make, pursuant to your Commission and these Instructions, that a continued space of land on the banks of all creeks and rivers, of the breadth of one hundred yards, be reserved free and common to all passengers and publick uses whatsoever.

(xxxi) Whereas there have been great complaints that H.M. soldiers in garrison at Annapolis have been very ill treated with regard to their clothing and provisions, and in several other respects; you shall make particular enquiry into any abuses of this kind that may have been heretofore, and transmit an account thereof to H.M. Secretary at War; and you shall take care that no occasion be given hereafter for complaints of this nature.

(xxxii) And whereas the settlements which have been made by H.M. subjects in Newfoundland have by experience been found prejudicial on many accounts to the trade of Great Britain, and it being apparently more for H.M. service and the intrest of his Dominions, to establish a British Colony in Nova Scotia sufficient to support its self against any attempts of other European nations and of the neighbouring [Mi’kmaq] ; you shall use all proper methods for inducing the present inhabitants of Newfoundland to remove to Nova Scotia as well for the better settlement and strengthening of that Colony as for improving the Fishery in those parts.

(xxxiii) And in order thereunto, you are hereby impowered to grant 100 acres of land to each family that shall transplant themselves from Newfoundland and settle under your Governmt. under the abovementioned Instructions for improvemt. of the said land to be held at a pepper corn rent for the first 20 years, from H.M., his heirs and successors, but to be afterwards subject to the same quit rents as shall be payable according to the preceding Instructions etc.

(xxxiv) The Officers of H.M. Ordnance having in pursuance to ye directions given in that behalf, appointed the making of a redoubt and other works at Placentia, which are judged sufficient for securing the fishery of H.M. subjects there, you shall give all the protection and assistance you are able to ye persons employ’d in raising the said fortifications. And when they shall be finished, you shall with the first convenient opportunity remove the garrison from thence to Annapolis Royal, leaving only such a number of men there, not exceeding 50, with proper officers as you shall judge sufficient for the defending of those works.

(xxxv) You shall strictly enjoin both the present and future garrison of Placentia and all H.M. Officers and soldiers, and other persons whatsoever belonging thereto, not to concern themselves in the fishery there nor interrupt the fishermen in ye curing of the fish nor to take up for themselves any beaches, stages or cook-rooms upon any pretence whatsoever, upon pain of H.M. highest displeasure. [C.O. 218, 1. pp. 417–448.]”

‘America and West Indies: June 1719, 16-30’, in Calendar of State Papers Colonial, America and West Indies: Volume 31, 1719-1720, ed. Cecil Headlam (London, 1933), pp. 123-146. British History Online [accessed 30 December 2020]. https://www.british-history.ac.uk/cal-state-papers/colonial/america-west-indies/vol31/pp123-146

English Settlement and Local Governance

nova scotia ensign

“Because post-Revolutionary American government resembled the practices of the corporation colonies, proprietary governments often have been neglected. Yet, the proprietary form represented an equally plausible approach to delegating governance authority. Englishmen interested in the settlements viewed the invention of the proprietary form as an improvement over the corporation colony; proprietaries achieved real settlement success. Nova Scotia (1621), Avalon (1623), Maryland (1632), and Maine (1639), as well as Carolina (1663), New York and New Jersey (1664), Pennsylvania (1681), and East Jersey (1682), all followed the proprietary form. The coexistence of settlements with authority delegated through corporate governance practices and those with authority delegated to individual feudal proprietors indicates the absence of preconceived notions about the appropriate manner of government for colonies.

Although we tend to think of the charter as emblematic of democratic constitutionalism, the term charter first appeared in the early proprietary grants. The proprietary form involved governing practices under which an inheritable proprietorship was given by the Crown to a nobleman, a cohort of titled lords served as councilors, and a dependent assembly assented to legislation. The proprietor acquired social status as the highest lord and the economic privilege of collecting quitrents (in essence, rents or taxes on land). His political authority was similar to the English palatinates of Durham and Chester; the social aspiration came from idealized English manorial society.

The impetus for proprietary charters seems to have arisen both from frustration with the corporation and the feudalistic aspirations of a few noblemen. The oft-forgotten Sir Ferdinando Gorges played an important role. Since 1607, Gorges had been involved in the failed colonial ventures of the Plymouth Company. In 1620, he abandoned the corporation approach and had the Company restructured as the “Council . . . for the planting, ruling, ordering, and governing of New-England” (the Council for New England). The Council was in form a board of proprietors, made up of noblemen and gentlemen. It held constitutionally limited lawmaking authority and granted land to Gorges, Council members, and friends. Some grants were never used and reverted; others did not prove particularly successful.

Although the Council’s grants did not prosper, others adopted the idea of proprietary settlements. In 1621, a Scottish nobleman, Sir William Alexander, obtained a charter from James I and the Scottish Privy Council naming him hereditary Lieutenant General over Nova Scotia (New Scotland). The charter, the first so described, gave Alexander extensive powers so long as the laws were “as consistent as possible” with those of Scotland. Alexander’s was a feudal vision: he established a Scottish-style feudal order, planned to raise money by creating hereditary Knights-Baronet, and obtained a coat of arms.

By contemporary standards, Nova Scotia was successful, surviving until the early 1630s when the settlement was evacuated pursuant to a French agreement. Other less successful settlements have drawn less attention.

On Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, older scholarship should be consulted:

D. W. Prowse, History of Newfoundland from the English, Colonial and Foreign Records (2d ed., London, 1896); St John Chadwick, Newfoundland: Island into Province (Cambridge, 1967); Thomas H. McGrail, Sir William Alexander, First Earl of Stirling: A Biographical Study (London, 1940), chapters 5 and 6 on Nova Scotia; George Pratt Insh, Scottish Colonial Schemes, 1620–1686 (Glasgow, 1922), ch. 2; and George Bourinot, Builders of Nova Scotia; A Historical Review (Toronto, 1900; includes the charter).”

Mary Sarah Bilder. “English Settlement and Local Governance.” The Cambridge History of Law in America Volume 1: Early America (1580–1815), Cambridge University Press (2008): 63-103. https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1941&context=lsfp

Beamish Murdoch: Nova Scotia’s National Historian

“Notable, however, was his apparent disinclination to leave Nova Scotia; he spent his entire life in Halifax save his last years, in retirement, in Lunenburg, where he died in 1876.”

“Murdoch was an historicist; he sought truth in documents. For the readers of his second volume, he took pains to explain this approach:

I have endeavoured to reduce the materials I had collected into a brief space, but there were many things that tended to exhibit and illustrate the peculiarities of the place, the times and the people, and some biographical particulars, that I felt were worth preservation. I might have followed a stricter, perhaps more classical model; but it seems to my mind that as the varied details of Gothic or Saracenic architecture produce a powerful effect in their combination, so the chronicler may, by diligence, unite many smaller features and occurrences, that, taken separately, might be dis-claimed by some, as below the dignity of history to record, and by this mode transport the reader, as it were, back to the actuality of past times, and make our forefathers live and move again as in life, by rendering us familiar with their ideas and habits….I feel justified in the endeavour to re-produce the past, as far as possible, in its own forms and colors and language, and, whenever I can, to make the very expressions {ipsissima verba) of the men who lived before us, exhibit their opinions and show their natures…(II, iii-iv)

Murdoch felt obliged to take special measures to safeguard the vestiges of the province’s past. “Some periods of our history”, he explained, “afford but little matter for connective narrative.”

Clarke, PD. “Beamish Murdoch: Nova Scotia’s National Historian” Acadiensis, XXI, 1 (Autumn 1991), pp. 85-109 https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/Acadiensis/article/view/11901/12745

Nova Scotia’s Blackstone

“Though Murdoch was a lawyer by profession and for several years a successful practitioner at the Bar, his tastes were essentially literary and historical . It was as a scholar and a gentleman that he impressed his contemporaries . One of these writing in the Acadian Recorder of October 11, 1863, under the pseudonym of Max, gives a very sympathetic view of Murdoch in contrast to other lawyers of his day. He describes him as, not tall, with a finely moulded head, considerably bald, soft hazel eyes, a kindly intelligent face, and a mouth that has “a peculiar twist while listening.” Capable of conversing volubly yet quietly, eager to talk of the present as well as the past, he is courteous to a fault and willing to impart information without fee. “He is, I believe,” continues Max, “a pretty sound and well-read lawyer. He has epitomized the laws of this province, and his book has done good service to others if not to himself. He is not unfrequently in the court, but always with an easy smile and a quiet voice and the demeanour of a gentleman .”

“What I like him for is that he seems to have followed the law more for the love of its science and its literature, and not to amass wealth or climb into the petty places which our politicians have to bestow. I like him moreover because he clings to the past. He is one of the few who have come out of the olden time with the fine aroma and sense of honour which belonged to it . The grasping, avaricious, sordid desires which burn the noble sentiments out of some lawyers’ natures seem not to have sunk into his grain. He has brought something of what is well worth preserving out of the past generation of lawyers to diffuse among the aspiring limbs of today.”

When this character sketch of Murdoch was written he was sixty-three years of age ; but, when he completed his epitome of the laws of Nova Scotia, he was only thirty-two. The Epitome, then, is remarkable not only for its early appearance in Nova Scotia but also for the the youthfulness of its author. It is remarkable, too that another youthful Nova Scotian, Joseph Howe, twenty-eight years of age, who had already lost heavily on the patriotic venture of publishing Haliburton’s history of his native province, should have undertaken to print a work with such a limited market as an epitome of the laws of a single province. But all three youths reflected the spirit of the new age ; and, because of this, our generation of Canadians owes a heavy debt of gratitude to the two authors Haliburton and Murdoch and to the publisher Howe.”

Harvey, DC. “Nova Scotia’s Blackstone” The Canadian Bar Review 1933 https://cbr.cba.org/index.php/cbr/article/download/228/228

On the origin and sources of the Law of Nova Scotia

The preface to Volume One of the Epitome acknowledges James Kent’s Commentaries on American Law’s usefulness. Murdoch, like Kent, was concerned with the “reception” of English law. He based Nova Scotia’s law on its statutes, interpreting them in light of English law. Murdoch’s success in this historical legal endeavor was remarkable, with no attempt to supersede or replicate the Epitome for subsequent Nova Scotian legal developments.

Nova Scotia’s history of governance is traced from French rule to English sovereignty. The province transitioned from French edicts to English law, with the monarch exercising legislative power through appointed governors and instructions. The establishment of courts and assemblies under royal authority shaped Nova Scotia’s legal system.

The province adopted English common law and statutes, with the Crown retaining legislative power, evidenced by various governmental changes without legislative involvement. Murdoch emphasizes the importance of consulting English legal principles, colonial American treatises, and provincial statutes for legal guidance.


“In his preface to volume one of the Epitome, Murdoch also acknowledged the usefulness of the four volume Commentaries on American Law, which James Kent, Chancellor of New York, published between 1826 and 1830. Murdoch, like Kent, was much concerned with the pressing problem of “reception” of English law. His device for dealing with it was to found Nova Scotia’s law firmly on the Province’s statutes, construing them in the light of English law, both common and statutory, and according to English law recognition only of so much of it as clearly remained in force in Nova Scotia because of the want of Nova Scotia statutory enactment. Perforce, such an undertaking was an exercise in legal history-a very obscure and confused legal history at that. His success was remarkable: none since has attempted to supersede the Epitome or to replicate it for subsequent Nova Scotian legal developments. Beamish Murdoch can justly be called the first-and greatest-legal historian of Nova Scotia.”

“Acadie, or Nova Scotia, was conquered by General Nicholson in 1710, and was ceded in 1713, by Louis 14, to Queen Anne by the Treaty of Utrecht prior to which it was governed by the edicts and orders of the King of France.

From 1710 to 1749 (when a Government was established at Halifax) the administration of the government was vested in a Governor and Council at Annapolis Royal.

During this period, each of the French Settlements, viz., that of the Annapolis River, Mines, Piziquid and Chignecto, elected annually a number of deputies. It was the duty of the deputies to wait on the Governor and Council at Annapolis Royal, and they formed a medium of communication between the Government and the people, receiving and publishing orders, etc., and it was considered to be their especial duty to carry into effect the orders of the Government.

Prior to the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, the province was governed by the orders and edicts of the French Monarch; and in matters of law, I believe the coutume de Paris was followed in Acadie, as it was in Canada, both of which were included under the name of New France.

On the conquest and subsequent cession of this country to the English Crown, the Monarch of England became sole lord and proprietor of the dominion, with the full right of legislating for the land and its inhabitants. This power was exercised only as far as necessity demanded, and only by means of the commissions issued by the Crown to the several Governors and the royal instructions given in connection with them. Directions were usually given with them to appoint a Council of twelve members selected from the principal inhabitants and settlers. Governor Philipps, in 1720, was obliged to fill up this number chiefly from the military and civil officers of the garrison of Annapolis, as the noblemen and chief inhabitants had abandoned the country on the conquest and the remaining inhabitants were not only wanting in the education and property requisite to qualify them for the position, but being Roman Catholic were considered ineligible by law under the tenor of the royal instructions and the acts of parliament then in force. Some of the Governors were desiring to appoint inhabitants to the office of justices of the peace, but they were forbidden to carry this into effect by the replies they received from the Lords of Trade and Plantations, who at that time formed a board for the management of colonial affairs.

The royal instructions also authorized the establishment of Courts of Justice in the colony. Under this authority the Governor and Council formed themselves into a General Court, with civil and criminal jurisdiction, sitting in four terms annually, without juries of any kind. This Court was held at Annapolis. The Governor also acted as Judge of Probate; and at Canso, where the English colonists held possession and resorted in numbers every summer for the fishery, Justices of Peace were appointed, and a committee chosen by the people acted in some respects as an Assembly.

The Council continued to be chiefly composed of the military Officers until 1749, and even then several were appointed in the first Council at Halifax.

In the instructions to the Governor of Nova Scotia there were always directions to call an assembly of the people, but owing to the almost entire absence of British inhabitants this instruction remained long inoperative.

The first House of Assembly met accordingly in 1758, all the freeholders of the province uniting in the elections at Halifax, as if it were one county. From this time forth legislation proceeded regularly, and the popular branch of government has gradually obtained the control of all the revenue and Crown property of the province.

Our assemblies, like those of several of the older British provinces, have been modelled in some respects after the Parliament of England; the Governor forming one branch as representing the Sovereign-His Majesty’s Council sitting as a House of Lords-and the representatives as a House of Commons. Colonies thus governed were (before the American revolution) called Crown Colonies, to distinguish them from those who had, like Massachusetts, a constitution underwritten charter from the King, or like Pennsylvania, a lord proprietor with peculiar rights and privileges.

The idea is, that in founding a province, we receive and adopt the general English Common Law, together with such ancient statutes as are considered to virtually form a part of it, such as the statutes of Magna Carta, Westminster, etc., for example; and that from the time of the erection of our local legislature, we take the Acts passed in the province only as imperative, unless where the Parliament in England, acting in the capacity of a Sovereign legislature over the whole British dominions or empire and nation expressly directs the clauses of a law to be in force in the colony.

We are also bound by a rule of great importance, in the observation of such decisions of the Courts of Law in the mother country, as elucidate the doctrines of the Common Law, define the privileges and prerogatives of the Crown, or throw light on statute law in force among us, either British or Provincial Acts.

Although changes of sovereignty have happened in a large proportion of the older colonies of England, yet, we find much valuable information bearing directly on our legal learning in the large number of American treatises and reports of the Courts of Law in the United States. In like manner the decisions of the Supreme Court in the sister province of New Brunswick are well worthy of our attention

If there be not clear decisions or texts of authority in English writers to solve the problem, our attention should be next directed to the reports of decisions in New England and other States, originally English colonies, to find out whether a decision or practice may not be contained in them to throw light on the point, as most of the adjudged cases in the United States, especially in New England, have been heretofore grounded on the ancient principles and maxims of the English Common Law, and modified by the circumstances and emergencies of new countries. The Statutes of our own Province, where they have a bearing on the inquiry and the cases reported in this and the sister provinces, are of course to be consulted.

That the sovereign legislative power of the Crown was not abandoned or supposed to cease on the erection of a Provincial assembly in Nova Scotia may be gathered from the several Acts of Government which occurred at different periods since, and which have all been acquiesced in.

1. The changes from viewing the province as one county with a Provost Marshal General, into several counties with Sheriffs, and from the election of all the representatives in a body by the freeholders of the province to representatives chosen by counties, districts and to townships, by act of the Crown (by order of Council in 1759).

2. A change (1765) from two members for every township to one member, by Act of Government, which, though complained of, was submitted to and confirmed by Provincial Act of that year.

3. The severance of New Brunswick in 1784 into a distinct province, the same being part of the territory of this Province and having its representatives in our assembly. This was effected by order of the Crown, without even notice previously to the Government or to the Assembly of Nova Scotia.

4. The island of Cape Breton was annexed to Nova Scotia in 1763, servered from it in 1784, and again annexed to it in 1820, all those changes were made by orders of the King, without any legislative interference.

5. In 1838, the constitution of the Government and Legislature were changed by orders of the Sovereign. The old council of 12 was abrogated and two councils substituted, and executive council and a legislative council, the latter a greater number of members than the old council.

Here are several organic changes in form of Government and in territory which were all completed without Acts either of the English or of the Provincial Parliament by the sole and exclusive authority of the Crown, and they are all subsequent to the calling of our first assemblies, and have occurred at distant periods in the last and present centuries.”

Beamish Murdoch, “On the origin and sources of the Law of Nova Scotia” (An essay on the Origin and Sources of the Law of Nova Scotia read before the Law Students Society, Halifax, N.S., 29 August 1863), (1984) 8:3 DLJ 197. https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1399&context=dlj

The American Revolution and Nova Scotia Reconsidered

“The New Englanders, moreover, were greatly dissatisfied with the Halifax government. Had not Francklin encouraged the Yorkshiremen to settle in the Isthmus? Furthermore, the New Englanders reacted violently to the fact that a small clique of Halifax merchants controlled the legislative and executive functions of government stubbornly refusing to grant to the New Englanders the right of ”township form of government” which Governor Lawrence had promised them in 1758 and 1759″

“What real impact did the Revolution have upon the inhabitants of Nova Scotia? Of course most of them resolved to adopt a policy of neutrality; many suffered because of the depredations of the American privateers; while a few, especially the Halifax merchants, grew rich from the usual profits of war. But was there nothing else? M. W. Armstrong has convincingly argued that probably the most important impact of the Revolution upon Nova Scotia was in precipitating the “Great Awakening of Nova Scotia.” In addition, Armstrong has emphasized that the “Great Awakening” encouraged the development of neutrality:

Indeed, the Great Awakening itself may be considered to have been a retreat from the grim realities of the world to the safety and pleasantly exciting warmth of the revival meeting, and to profits and rewards of another character … an escape from fear and divided loyalties … an assertion of democratic ideals and a determination to maintain them, the Great Awakening gave self respect and satisfaction to people whose economic and political position was both humiliating and distressing.

The prophet and evangelist of the spiritual awakening was Henry Alline who, when he was twelve, had moved from Rhode Island to Falmouth, Nova Scotia. An uneducated farmer, Alline had experienced an unusual “Conversion”, and in 1776 he began to preach an emotional Christian message that has been described as being a combination of “Calvinism, Antinomianism, and Enthusiasm.” The flames of religious revival swept up the Minas Basin in 1777, across the Bay of Fundy in 1779, and to the South Shore in 1781. All Protestant Churches in Nova Scotia were in one way or another affected by the “Great Awakening”, and largely as a direct result the evangelical wing of the various Protestant Churches was able to dominate Maritime religious life throughout the nineteenth century”

Rawlyk, George A. “The American Revolution and Nova Scotia Reconsidered”, Dalhousie Review, Volume 43, Number 3, 1963 https://dalspace.library.dal.ca/bitstream/handle/10222/62718/dalrev_vol43_iss3_pp379_394.pdf

The Constitutional Distribution of Taxation Powers in Canada

Nelson v. Dartmouth, perhaps part of the genesis for the Trailer Park Boys.


“After the Act of Union in 1840, British opinion mounted for Canada to become responsible for her own defence. At the same time, American pressure on the western territories became severe. The Northern Pacific Railway, chartered by Americans in 1864, had the object of providing transcontinental service. American settlement was pushing ever northward. Without the protection of British troops, American expansionist claims to the west seemed impossible to resist.

The scheme of Confederation was principally designed to overcome these problems. It was thought that a larger, strongly centralized political unit would be capable of (a) re-establishing the public credit, (b) undertaking the considerable public expenditure on transport which was the condition precedent to development, and (c) offering a sufficient defence posture to resist American pressure.”

Cultural and sectional rivalries proved insuperable obstacles to the legislative union foreseen by Sir John A. Macdonald. A federal state, characterized by strong cultural and regional guarantees, was the compromise. But there was to be no question of economic decentralization. By the British North America Act, 1867 the Dominion government was granted legislative power over:

91(3) The raising of Money by any Mode or System of Taxation.

By section 122 of the Act customs and excise, which accounted for the vast bulk of public revenue immediately prior to Confederation, were brought within the central government’s exclusive competence. Section 118 of the Act, since repealed, 4 made provision for payment of subsidies by the central government to the provinces, with the intent that they be “in full settlement of all future demands on Canada”. In the early years of Confederation such subsidies accounted for some fifty per cent of all provincial revenues.”

“Three mechanisms were tried to ameliorate this unsatisfactory constitutional arrangement. The first was dissolution of the Confederation. This was not conspicuously successful. Nova Scotia was the only government to attempt it. Within two years after union, under the leadership of Joseph Howe, the Imperial Parliament was petitioned to release the province from Confederation. The second alternative involved an increase in the subsidies paid under the B.N.A. Act. Despite some early federal willingness to alter the subsidies stated by the B.N.A. Act to be in full settlement of all claims on the central government, several events intervened to make the Dominion government rely on the full settlement clause and refuse further increase. A global depression, beginning in 1873, placed a severe crimp in the central government’s fiscal capacities. The railroads entailed vast expense, creating further federal monetary restraint. From 1873 until 1906 the subsidy payments stood unaltered. Lastly, resort by the provinces to their own powers of taxation was explored. Some means had to be developed to make these significant. The means found was a judicial stretching of the concept of “direct taxation” to encompass modes of taxation which would have been quite unimaginable to the Fathers of Confederation.”

“In Nelson v. Dartmouth a municipal by-law imposed a license fee of $15 per month on operators of mobile home home situated in the mobile home park. The by-law was attacked as ultra vires in that it overstepped the limits of section 92(9). Counsel argued that the legislation was enacted for the colourable purpose of imposing a personal property tax upon the owners of mobile homes situated in the parks in question. Mr. Justice MacDonald, in considering this submission, held as follows:

In my view, a genuine licensing-tax provision imposed for the primary purpose of revenue or for revenue purposes incidental to valid provincial regulation of such an operation as that of mobile home parks-as is the case here-is not invalidated by the circumstance that the tax may be indirect in its general incidence (See Laskin, Canadian Constitutional Law, 2nd ed., pp. 754-5; and Reference re Farm Products Marketing Act…).

There is no requirement in this case that the indirect taxation by way of license fee be limited to the expenses of the regulatory scheme, nor is there any indication that the fees were so limited. The only limitation referred to by the court is that the license fees must be in relation to the regulation of mobile home parks and not in relation to the raising of revenue by indirect taxation.”

Magnet, Joseph Eliot “The Constitutional Distribution of Taxation Powers in Canada”, Ottawa Law Review, 1978 https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/olr_10.1_magnet.pdf

Building Halifax 1841-1871

“In the early-1860s the increase in the number of carpenters, the building boom with its opportunities in a larger market for specialization, and local labour tension all contributed to formal subdivision among carpenters. Incorporation of the House Joiners’ Union Society of Halifax and of the Shipwrights’ and Caulkers’ Association of Halifax and Dartmouth in 1864 marked a trade consciousness which was demonstrated in a carpenters’ strike for higher wages later that year.”

Buggey, S. “Building Halifax 1841-1871”. Acadiensis, vol. 10, no. 1, Sept. 1980, p. p. 90, https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/Acadiensis/article/view/11541.

Our First Common Law Court

“That for the reasons aforesaid His Excellency the Governor and Members of his Majesty’s Council for this Province hold and keep a Court of Judicature for said Province annually at the respective times and place here mentioned, viz: at Annapolis royal upon the first Tuesday in May, August, November, and February yearly and in every year from time to time. Which Court to have the same Style and Cognizance of all matters and pleas brought before them and power to give Judgment and award. Execution thereupon, by the same manner and proceedings as the General Court so called of Governor and Council has in Virginia, and practices at this time. Voted that his Excellency be desired to put out a proclamation relating to the time, and place where the aforesaid Court be held and the manner of the Court, and that as soon as may be.”

Governor Phillips reported his action to the Secretary of State, and in the course of this communication he observed: “In order to establish civil government the Governor and Council have resolved themselves into a Court, to meet four times a year. The notion that martial law prevails here hinders settlers from coming into the country.”

The present writer has shown elsewhere the extent to which, from the time of Governor Phillips to the time when Governor Cornwallis received his commission and entered upon the discharge of his duties, “the Iawes of Virginia” were applied, and were made “the rule and pattern” for the Government of Nova Scotia. The court established by Governor Phillips and his Council was invested with the powers ordinarily exercised by an English common law court. It had jurisdiction in both civil and criminal matters, and a perusal of the original Minutes of His Majesty’s Council at Annapolis Royal will disclose the varied character of the causes which came before our first court for adjudication. It was a common law court; that is to say, it administered the common law that collection of principles which constitutes the basis of the administration of justice in England, as distinguished from the maxims of the Roman code generally known as the civil law. One of its greatest expositors says of it:

“It is emphatically the custom of the realm of England, and has no authority beyond her own territory and the colonies which she has planted in various parts of the world. It is no small proof of its excellence, however, that where it has once taken root it has never been superseded …… The common law is the lex non scripta, that is, the unwritten law which cannot now be traced back to any positive text, but is composed of customs and usages and maxims deriving their authority from immemorial practice, and the recognition of courts of justice.”

Chisholm, J.M. “Our First Common Law Court” Dalhousie Review, Volume 01, Number 1, 1921 https://dalspace.library.dal.ca/bitstream/handle/10222/58007/dalrev_vol1_iss1_pp17_24.pdf

Page 30 of 33
1 27 28 29 30 31 32 33