A short statement of facts relating to the history, manners, customs, language, and literature of the [Mi’kmaq] tribe

This contains the most charitable and interesting sections of the book. Many of these vintage titles I’ve found contain so much that is superfluous or offensive that I try to be selective, not to paint a pretty picture, but to find anything that approached a realization of the gravity of the situation. I don’t think these excerpts represent the totality of the opinion at the time, or the prevalent opinion, so I don’t take them as broadly representative. They were representative enough, however, to have found their way into print.

An interesting connection I noticed was what I think is a reference to Cain and Abel, below (“And when they shall have passed away, and their very name is forgotten by our children, will not the voice of our brother’s blood cry unto God from the ground? And in the Day of Judgment when all past actions will be brought to light, and the despised [indigenous person] will stand on a level with his now more powerful neighbor, then as poor and as helpless as himself; when the Searcher of Hearts shall demand of us, “Where is thy brother?”, how shall we answer this question, if we make not now one last effort to save them!”).

This is reminiscent of Quaker Joshua Evans of West Jersey, who visited Dartmouth in 1795, 55 years earlier, who often preached “something is yet due the [Mi’kmaq] for land wrongfully taken”. He would often compare the blood of Abel, calling out for revenge, to the blood of slaves and [Mi’kmaq].

Something else I am interested in is the contention here that the Mi’kmaq language resembles Hebrew, “especially in the suffixes by which the Personal Pronouns are connected in the Accusative Case, with the Verb.” Truly fascinating.


“Drunkenness is fearfully prevalent … though not so much of late years as formerly; and other vices resulting from the proximity of what we proudly call “civilization”, a civilization which too often seeks its own interest and gratification, regardless of either the temporal or spiritual interests of others; caring for neither soul or body.”

“Chiefs are … duly elected. The [Mi’kmaq] assemble on such occasions to give their votes, and any one who knows any just cause why the candidate should not be elected, is at liberty to state it. Councils too are held, to which ten different tribes, extending from Cape Breton to Western Canada, send their delegates; and they seem to consider the affair as important as it ever was.”

“The language of the [Mi’kmaq] is very remarkable. One would think it must be exceedingly barren, limited in inflection, and crude. But just the reverse is the fact. It is copious, flexible, and expressive. Its declension of Nouns, and conjugation of Verbs, are as regular as the Greek, and twenty times as copious. The full conjugation of one Micmac Verb, would fill quite a large volume! … in other respects the language resembles the Hebrew. Especially in the suffixes by which the Personal Pronouns are connected in the Accusative Case, with the Verb.”

“We have treated them almost as though they had no rights, and as if it were somewhat doubtful whether they even have souls.”

“…they have some knowledge of Astronomy. They have watched the stars during their night excursions, or while laying wait for game. They know that the North star does not move, and they call it “okwo-lunuguwa kulokiiwech,” “the North star.” They have observed that the circumpolar stars never set. They call the Great Bear, “Muen” the bear. And they have names for several other constellations. The morning star is ut’adabum, and the seven stars ejulkuch. And “what do you call that?” said a venerable old lady a short time ago, who with her husband, the head chief of Cape Breton, was giving me a lecture on Astronomy, on nature’s celestial globe, through the apertures of the wigwam. She was pointing to the “milky way”. “Oh we call it the milky way — the milky road,” said I. To my surprise she gave it the same name in [Mi’kmaq].”

“Now all these facts relate to the question of the intellectual capacity of the [Mi’kmaq]; the degree of knowledge existing among them; and the possibility of elevating them in the scale of humanity. If such be their degree of mental improvement, with all their disadvantages, what might they not become, were the proper opportunity afforded? Shame on us! We have seized upon the lands which the Creator gave to them. We have deceived, defrauded, and neglected them. We have taken no pains to aid them; or our efforts have been feeble and ill-directed. We have practically pronounced them incapable of improvement, or unworthy of the trouble; and have coolly doomed the whole race to destruction. But dare we treat them thus, made as they are in the image of God like ourselves? Dare we neglect them any longer? Will not the bright sun and the blue heavens testify against us? And will not this earth which we have wrested away from them, lift up its voice to accuse us? And when they shall have passed away, and their very name is forgotten by our children, will not the voice of our brother’s blood cry unto God from the ground? And in the Day of Judgment when all past actions will be brought to light, and the despised [indigenous person] will stand on a level with his now more powerful neighbor, then as poor and as helpless as himself; when the Searcher of Hearts shall demand of us, “Where is thy brother?” how shall we answer this question, if we make not now one last effort to save them! We will make such an effort. We are doing so, and God is with us. He will crown our labours with success. We will implore forgiveness for the past, and wisdom and grace for the future.”

Rand, Silas Tertius. “A short statement of facts relating to the history, manners, customs, language, and literature of the Micmac tribe of Indians” [Halifax, N.S.? : s.n.] 1850. https://archive.org/details/cihm_39506

Statistics Relative to Nova Scotia in 1851

Screenshot-2021-06-08-at-23-54-26-Statistics-Relative-to-Nova-Scotia-in-1851-2338357-pdf

“The constitution of Nova Scotia is a representative provincial government. The Lieutenant-Governor, who is subordinate to the Governor-General of British North America, is commander within the province; and the supreme civil as well as military authority under him, is a council of twelve members, of whom the bishop and chief justice are members ex officio, and the rest appointed by the Crown. The legislative assembly consists of a body of forty-one members, elected by 40s. freeholders. It is elected, like the British House of Commons, for seven years, but may be prorogued or dissolved by the Lieutenant-Governor. It meets every year, and all money bills must originate in this assembly; other bills require the consent of the Governor and council before they become law. For the purposes of election, Nova Scotia is divided into ten counties. The counties have two members each, and the other representatives are returned by the towns. Justice is administered by a Court of Queen’s Bench, sitting at Halifax, and by district courts in the different counties. The common and statute law of England are in force. The laws are, on the whole, considered judicious, and, as far as they go, calculated to promote the prosperity of the colony, but the harmony of society is too often broken by a love of litigation.”

“Church of England is the established religion, and in 1838 the colony was divided into thirty-two parishes, each of which had a rector salaried by the Crown, or by the society for the propagation of the gospel. Nova Scotia was made a bishopric in 1787, the diocese extending over New Brunswick and Prince Edward’s Island, Newfoundland and the Bermudas.”

Census of the Province of Nova Scotian in 1851

SexAge
Under 1010 to 2020 to 3030 to 4040 to 50Above 50Total
Male44,00033,79120,27714,61510,61614,378137,677
Female43,45233,44422,38514,66510,27114,223138,440
Total87,45267,23542,66229,28020,88728,601276,117
Table I: Census of the Province of Nova Scotian in 1851

Condition of the People

MalesFemales
Married39,351Married39,351
Widowers2,238Widowers5,916
Bachelors52,088Spinsters49,721
Boys (under 10)44,000Girls (under 10)43,452
Total137,677Total138,440
Table II: Condition of the People

Occupation, Pursuit, or Calling of a large proportion of the inhabitants

Clergymen288Farmers31,604
Lawyers143Engaged in the fisheries9,927
Doctors145Registered seamen1,413
Merchants and traders2,415Employed at sea3,961
Employed in manufactories3,200Engaged in lumbering1,254
Mechanics8,895
Table III: Occupation, Pursuit, or Calling of a large proportion of the inhabitants

Blind, Deaf and Dumb, Idiots and Lunatics

BlindDeaf and DumbIdiotsLunaticsTotal
Males7413217676458
Females629812390373
Total136230299166831
Table IV: Blind, Deaf and Dumb, Idiots and Lunatics

[indigenous persons] and black Persons]

[indigenous persons]black Persons]Total
Males5242,3212,845
Females5322,5873,119
Total1,0564,9085,964
Table V: [indigenous persons] and black Persons]

Crops, Grain and otherwise

Wheat297,157bushelsPeas and beans21,638bushels
Barley196,097bushelsGrass seeds3,686bushels
Rye61,438bushelsPotatoes1,986,789bushels
Oats1,384,437bushelsTurnips467,127bushels
Buck-wheat170,301bushelsOther roots32,325bushels
Indian corn37,475bushelsHay287,837tons
Table VI: Crops, Grain and otherwise

Live stock

Horses28,789Sheep282,180
Neat Cattle156,857Swine51,533
Milch Cows85,856
Table VII: Live stock

Fisheries in 1851

Vessels employed812Quantity of fish oil189,250*
Tonnage43,333Value of ditto in £17,754
Men3,681Quantity of dry fish cured196,434*
Boats employed5,161Salmon in barrels1,669
Men6,713Shad3,536
Quantity of smoked herrings15,409*Mackerel100,047
Value of ditto in £217,270Herrings53,200
Nets and seines30,154Alewives5,343
* In the returns there is nothing to show what these numbers indicate
Table VIII: Fisheries in 1851

Coals, Lime, Bricks and Gypsum

Coal raised, in chaldrons114,992Gypsum quarried, in tons79,795
Baskets of lime burnt28,603Value of ditto in £10,498
Value of ditto in £4,433Grindstones quarried , in tons37,540
Bricks made2,845,400Value of ditto in £5,857
Value of ditto in £3,211
Table IX: Coals, Lime, Bricks and Gypsum

Manufactories

Mills, Factories, &c.NumberValue in £Hands employed
Saw mills1,15389,8691,786
Grist mills39872,649437
Steam mills or factories10
Tanneries23726,762374
Foundries912,900138
Weaving and carding establishments8111,690119
Hand looms11,09624,486
Breweries and distilleries176,03242
Other factories13114,382185
Table X: Manufactories
Iron smeltedin tons400Agricultural implementsvalue in £
16,640
Value of dittoin £
4,635Charis and cabinet warevalue in £11,155
Value of castingsin £3,486Carriagesvalue in £9,491
Flannelin yds.219,352Other wooden warevalue in £19,233
Fulled clothin yds.119,698Boots and shoesvalue in £73,654
Cloth not fulledin yds.790,104Leathervalue in £52,625
Malt liquorin galls.78,076Soap value in £28,277
Distilled liquorin galls.11,900Candlesvalue in £21,210
Maple sugarin lbs.110,441
Manufactories, continued

Shipping

CountiesEntered InwardsCleared Outwards
ShipsTonnageShipsTonnage
Great Britain9727,88610229,739
British Colonies2,517149,6312,815179,712
United States1,211136,5801,266139,427
Foreign18118,039495,299
Total4,006332,1364,232354,177
Table XI: Shipping

Religious Denominations

Church of England36,482Methodists23,596
Roman Catholics69,634Copngregationalists2,639
Kirk of Scotland18,867Universalists580
Presbyterian Church of Nova Scotia28,767Lutherans4,087
Free Church25,280Sandemanians101
Baptists42,243Quakers188
Other denominations3,791
Table XII: Religious Denominations

Houses, Buildings, &c.

Inhabited houses41,455Paupers1,072
Families45,541Rate payers38,388
Uninhabited houses2,028Probable value of real estate in £8,050,923
Houses building2,347
Stores, barns, and outhouses52,758
Table XIII: Houses, Buildings, &c.

Cheshire, Edward. “Statistics Relative to Nova Scotia in 1851.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London, vol. 17, no. 1, 1854, pp. 73–80. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2338357. Accessed 9 June 2021.

Catalogue of books in the Nova Scotia Legislative Council Library

The collection of documents in Nova Scotia’s legislative library is much larger than what’s included here, I’ve focused particularly on those Acts, documents and papers that pertain to neighboring States. The Acts of the Legislature of Virginia, Constitution of the United States, and various documents from New York, indicate a deep connection between Nova Scotia and the United States. These documents were used to guide the formation of legislation in Nova Scotia’s early years, suggesting a significant influence from American legal traditions and political frameworks.

The inclusion of Virginia’s historical documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and Constitution of Virginia, alongside New York’s assembly and senate journals and laws, highlights the reliance on American precedents and models in shaping Nova Scotia’s legal and legislative systems. This connection underscores the historical ties and shared legal heritage between Nova Scotia, Virginia and New York, among other States.


“Catalogue: Acts of the Parliament of Virginia, 1660 to 1748, Annals of Congress from 1789 to 1797, Assembly Journals of New York 1850 to 1855, Assembly Documents of New York 1850 to 1855, Senate Journals of New York 1850 to 1855, Senate documents of New York 1850 to 1855, Chalmer’s Introduction to the History of the Revolt of the American Colonies, Colonial History of New York, DeTocqueville’s Democracy in America, Dixon’s Life of William Penn, Documentary History of New York, Documents relating to the colonial History of New York-vol. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9, Journals of Provincial Congress of New York, 1775-1776-1777, Laws of New York from 1691 to 1773, Laws of New York from 1850-1855″

Acts of the Legislature of Virginia

  1. Resolution of the Convention of Virginia, authorising their delegates in Congress to declare American independence. Constitution of the United States. Declaration of independence. Articles of confederation. Declaration of rights of Virginia. Constitution of Virginia. Ancient charters relating to the first settlement of Virginia. Commission to Sir Francis Wyatt (July 24th, 1621) Instructions to Governor Wyatt (July 24th, 1621) Acts of assembly, 1619-1649. Articles at the surrender of the country, &c. Acts of assembly, 1652-1660
  2. 1660-1682. Historical documents from 1660 to 1682
  3. 1684-1710. Historical documents from 1682 to 1710
  4. 1711-1736
  5. 1738-1748

Annals of Congress from 1789 to 1797

  1. Debates of Congress March 4, 1789-June 1, 1796
  2. The United States Senate, 1787-1801: a dissertation on the first fourteen years of the upper legislative body
  3. General index of the Journals of Congress 1789-1809, from the First to Tenth Congress inclusive
  4. Sketches of debate in the first Senate of the United States 1789-91

Assembly Journals of New York

  1. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1850 v1
  2. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1851 v1
  3. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1851 v2
  4. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1852
  5. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1853 v1
  6. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1853 v2
  7. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1854
  8. Journal of the Assembly of the State of New York, 1855

Assembly Documents of New York

  1. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1850:no.1-15)
  2. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1850:no.18-49)
  3. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1850:no.199)
  4. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1851:no.1-21)
  5. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1851:no.22-44)
  6. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1851:no.45-90)
  7. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1851:no.91-131)
  8. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1851:no.150-159)
  9. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.1-27)
  10. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.28-88)
  11. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.89)
  12. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.90)
  13. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.91-125)
  14. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.126)
  15. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1852:no.127-129)
  16. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1853:no.1-14)
  17. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1853:no.15-54)
  18. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1853:no.55-80)
  19. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1853:no.81-111)
  20. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1854:no.1-39)
  21. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1854:no.76-124)
  22. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1854:no.125-144)
  23. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1854:no.145-150)
  24. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1854:no.151)
  25. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.1-24)
  26. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.25-59)
  27. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.60-80)
  28. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.81-115)
  29. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.116-144)
  30. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.145)
  31. Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, (1855:no.146-151)

Senate Journals of New York

  1. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.73 1850
  2. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.74 1851
  3. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.75 1852
  4. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.76 1853
  5. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.77 1854
  6. Journal of the Senate of the State of New York, sess.78 1855

Senate documents of New York

  1. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 73rd v.1 no.1-40(1850)
  2. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 73rd v.2 no.41-75(1850)
  3. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 73rd v.3 no.76-113(1850)
  4. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 1851 v.1
  5. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 74th v.2 no.21-64(1851)
  6. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 74th v.3 no.65-97(1851)
  7. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, 75th v.1 no.1-50(1852)
  8. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, (1852:no.51-92)
  9. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, (1852:no.93-98)
  10. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.76 v.1 1853
  11. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.76 v.2 1853
  12. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.76 v.3 1853
  13. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.77 v.1 1854
  14. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.77 v.2 1854
  15. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.77 v.3 1854
  16. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.78 v.1 1855
  17. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.78 v.2 1855
  18. Documents of the Senate of the State of New York, c.1 sess.78 v.3 1855

The Documentary history of the State of New York

  1. The Documentary history of the state of New-York Vol.1
  2. The Documentary history of the state of New-York Vol.2
  3. The Documentary history of the state of New-York Vol.3
  4. The Documentary history of the state of New-York Vol.4

Documents relating to the colonial History of New York

  1. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.1
  2. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.2
  3. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.3
  4. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.4
  5. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.5
  6. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.6
  7. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.7
  8. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.8
  9. Documents relating to the colonial History of New York, v.9

Laws of the State of New York from 1850-1855

  1. Laws of the State of New York, 1850
  2. Laws of the State of New York, 1851
  3. Laws of the State of New York, 1852
  4. Laws of the State of New York, 1853
  5. Laws of the State of New York, 1854
  6. Laws of the State of New York, 1855

Nova Scotia. Legislative Council. Library. Catalogue of Books In the Legislative Council Library: 1859. [Halifax, N.S.?: s.n.], 1859. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/aeu.ark:/13960/t45q5c924

Acadia, or, A month with blue noses

“As I said before, to make the festivities complete, in the afternoon there was a procession to lay the corner-stone of a Lunatic Asylum. But oh! how the jolly old rain poured down upon the luckless pilgrimage! There were the “Virgins” of Masonic Lodge No. -, the Army Masons, in scarlet; the African Masons, in ivory and black; the Scotch-piper Mason, with his legs in enormous plaid trowsers, defiant of Shakspeare’s theory about the sensitiveness of some men, when the bag-pipe sings i’ the nose; the Clerical Mason in shovel hat; the municipal artillery; the Sons of Temperance, and the band. Away they marched, with drum and banner, key and compasses, BIBLE and sword, to Dartmouth, in great feather, for the eyes of Halifax were upon them.”

“Is this fairy land ? No, it is only poor, old, barren Nova Scotia, and yet I think Felix, Prince of Salerno, if he were here, might say, and say truly too, “In all my life I never beheld a more enchanting place ;” but Felix, Prince of Salerno, must remember this is the month of June, and summer is not perpetual in the latitude of forty-five.

“Mrs. Deer,” said I, “how long have you lived here?”
“Oh, sah, a good many yoare ; I cum here afore I had Bill dar.” “Where did you reside before you came to Nova Scotia?” “Sah?” “Where did you live?” “Oh, sah! I is from Maryland.” (William at it again.) “Did you run away?” “Yes, sah; I left when I was young. Bill, what you laughing at? I was young once.” “Were you married then-when you run away?” “Oh yes, sah!” (a glance at Bill, who was off again).”

And left your husband behind in Maryland?” “Yes, sah; but he didn’t stay long dar after I left. He was after me putty sharp, soon as I travelled;” (here Mrs. Deer and William interchanged glances, and indulged freely in mirth). “And which place do you like the best-this or Maryland?” “Why, I never had no such work to do at home as I have to do here, grubbin’ up old stumps and stones; dem isn’t women’s work. When I was home, I had only to wait on misses, and work was light and easy.” (William quiet.)

“But which place do you like the best-Nova Scotia or Maryland?” “Oh! de work here is awful, grubbin’ up old stones and stumps; ’tain’t fit for women.” (William much impressed with the cogency of this repetition.) “But which place do you like the best?” ” And de winter here, oh! it’s wonderful tryin.” (William utters an affirmative flash.)” But which place do you like the best?” “And den dere’s de rheumatiz.”

“But which place do you like the best, Mrs. Deer?” “‘Well,” said Mrs. Deer, glancing at Bill, “I like Nova Scotia best.” (Whatever visions of Maryland were gleaming in William’s mind, seemed to be entirely quenched by this remark.) “But why,” said I, “do you prefer Nova Scotia to Maryland? Here you have to work so much harder, to suffer so much from the cold and the rheumatism, and get so little for it;” for I could not help looking over the green patch of stony grass that has been rescued by the labor of a quarter century.

“Oh!” replied Mrs. Deer, “de difference is, dat when I work here, I work for myself, and when I was working at home, I was working for other people.” (At this, William broke forth again in such a series of platoon flashes, that we all joined in with infinite merriment.) “Mrs. Deer,” said I, recovering my gravity, “I want to ask you one more question.” “Well, sah,” said the lady Deer, cocking her head on one side, expressive of being able to answer any number of questions in a twinkling. “‘ You have, no doubt, still many relatives left in Maryland?” “Oh! yes,” replied Mrs. Deer, “all of dem are dar.”

“And suppose you had a chance to advise them in regard to this matter, would you tell them to run away, and take their part with you in Nova Scotia, or would you advise them to stay where they are?” Mrs. Deer, at this, looked a long time at William, and William looked earnestly at his parent. Then she cocked her head on the other side, to take a new view of the question. Then she gathered up mouth and eyebrows, in a puzzle, and again broadened out upon Bill in an odd kind of smile; at last she doubled up one fist, put it against her cheek, glanced at Bill, and out came the answer: “Well, sah, I’d let’em take dere own heads for dat!”

I must confess the philosophy of this remark awakened in me a train of very grave reflections; but my companion burst into a most obstreperous laugh. As for Mrs. Deer, she shook her old hips as long as she could stand, and then sat down and continued, until she wiped the tears out of her eyes with the corner of her apron. William cast himself down upon a strawberry bank, and gave way to the most flagrant mirth, kicking up his old shoes in the air, and fairly wallowing in laughter and blossoms. I endeavored to change the subject.

“Bill, did you catch any trout?” It was some time before William could control himself enough to say, “Not a single one, sah;” and then he rolled over on his back, put his black paws up to his eyes, and twitched and jingled to his heart’s content. I did not ask Mrs. Deer any more questions; but there is a moral in the story, enough for a day.

As we rattled over the road, after our brief dinner at Deer’s Castle, I could not avoid a pervading feeling of gloom and disappointment, in spite of the balmy air and pretty landscape. The old ragged abodes of wretchedness seemed to be too clearly defined-to stand out too intrusively against the bright blue sky. But why should I feel so much for Cuffee? Has he not enlisted in his behalf every philanthropist in England? Is he not within ten miles of either the British flag or Acadia? Does not the Duchess of Sutherland entertain the authoress of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and the Black Swan? Why should I sorrow for Cuffee, when he is in the midst of his best friends?

Why should I pretend to say that this appears to be the raggedest, the meanest, the worst condition of humanity, when the papers are constantly lauding British philanthropy, and holding it up as a great example, which we must “bow down and worship?”

For my own part, although the pleasant fiction of seeing Cuffee clothed, educated, and Christianized, seemed to be somewhat obscured in this glimpse of his real condition, yet I hope he will do well under his new owners; at the very least, I trust his berry crop will be good, and that a benevolent British blanket or two may enable him to shiver out the winter safely, if not comfortably.

Poor William Deer, Sen’r, of Deer’s Castle, was suffering with rheumatism in the next apartment, while we were at his eggs and bacon in the banquet hall; but Deer of Deer’s Castle is a prince to his neighbors. I shall not easily forget the brightening eye, the swift glance of intelligence in the face of another old black man], an hostler, in Nova Scotia.

He was from Virginia, and adopting the sweet, mellifluous language of his, own home, I asked him whether he liked best to stay where he was, or go back to “Old Virginny i” “0 massa!” said he, with such a look. “you must know dat I has de warmest side for my own country!” We rattled soberly into Dartmouth, and took the ferry-boat across the bay to the city.”


Cozzens, Frederick Swartwout. “Acadia, or, A month with blue noses.” New York: Derby & Jackson, 1859. http://name.umdl.umich.edu/AGD6191.0001.001, https://archive.org/details/acadiaoramonthw01cozzgoog

The Maritime Provinces, 1850-1939: Lawyers and Legal Institutions

The achievement of Responsible government in the Maritimes marked a potential shift in legal cultures, but its impact is debated. Early literature hailed it as a triumph, promising open careers, increased government accountability, and democratic participation. Recent historians, however, emphasize continuity, suggesting that old elites retained power. The transition from imperial patronage to partisan allegiance was seen as the primary change. Legal reforms accompanied Responsible government, including criminal law changes and court structure modernization. Statute law underwent significant revision, reflecting ideals of brevity and efficiency while conserving legal traditions.

Chancery courts, criticized for privilege and inefficiency, were abolished, merging equity jurisdiction with common law. Some cities experimented with elected municipal courts, reflecting a shift towards responsive governance. Franchise expansion occurred, but property qualifications remained, and women were excluded from voting. The legal profession saw diversity milestones, with the first Black lawyers admitted and the first Acadian and female lawyers recognized. These changes suggest a gradual opening of legal institutions to broader participation, albeit with lingering exclusions and challenges to overcome.


The achievement of Responsible government in the Maritimes created possibilities for significant change in their legal cultures. Whether those possibilities were actualised is a matter of some debate, closely linked to a major theme in Maritime historiography: the meaning of responsible government. An older literature, echoing much contemporary opinion, celebrated the triumph of the reformers as an unqualified good. Careers would open to talents, government would be rendered more accountable, and the humble yeoman would be able to participate actively in a more democratic form of government. In recent decades historians have taken a more jaundiced view of the achievements of responsible government. They have stressed continuity rather than change, suggesting that older elites retained most of their economic and political power. At worst, all that the transition to responsible government involved was replacement of a system based on imperial patronage to one based on partisan allegiance. (or the older view, see G. Patterson, Studies in Nova Scotian History (Halifax: Imperial Publishing, 1940) at 34-46. More recently, see J.M. Beck, The Politics of Nova Scotia, vol. I (Tantallon, N.S.: Four East, 1985) at 266-72.)

“The first stirrings of political reform had seen some significant steps towards an overhaul of statute law. Significant reform of the criminal law, for example, occurred in New Brunswick in 1831, Prince Edward Island in 1836 and Nova Scotia in 1841. Benefit of clergy was abolished, the number of capital offences reduced, criminal procedure rationalised, and in Nova Scotia whipping and the pillory abolished. In 1842 these reforms were capped by the opening of New Brunswick’s first provincial penitentiary in Saint John, followed two years later by one in Halifax. Lord Falkland’s coalition ministry in Nova Scotia (1841) also saw a package of reforms in the civil law and court structure, which included abolition of the Inferior Court of Common Pleas and modernisation of the divorce and probate courts. (An Act to improve the Administration of the Law, and to reduce the number of Courts of Justice , S.N.S. 1841, chapter 3. An Act relating to the Courts of Probate, S.N.S. 1842, chapter 22. An Act concerning the Court of Marriage and Divorce, S.N.S. 1841, c. 13. New Brunswick had altered its divorce court in 1834, although it did not formally exclude the lieutenant-governor from the court, as did Nova Scotia: S.N.B. 1834, c. 30.)

These developments reached their logical culmination in the Revised Statutes of Nova Scotia 1851, modelled closely on the Massachusetts revision of 1828, the first such revision promulgated within the British tradition. New Brunswick followed quickly, producing its first “consolidation” in 1854; Prince Edward Island’s came in 1862. Stylishly produced and thematically organised, these revisions represented the best of the legal culture of the pre-responsible government era, but packaged in a way which respected the new ideals of brevity, accessibility and efficiency. The New Brunswick commissioners declared proudly that they had “compressed the language of the Acts [into] one fourth, or often one sixth, the bulk of their former size.”‘ The revised statutes amended as well as conserved the law, limiting the maximum period of imprisonment for debt to one year in Nova Scotia, adding the first interpretation act to the New Brunswick statute book, and abolishing entails in both provinces”

“In both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, one of the first targets of the new governments was the courts of chancery, which could be portrayed as embodying the worst flaws of earlier times: privilege, inaccessibility (the court never ventured outside the capital), delay, expense and obscurity. Empirical evidence suggests that these criticisms may not all have been valid, but few rose to defend the court. New Brunswick abolished theirs in 1854, transferring its jurisdiction, along with its incumbent judge to its Supreme Court, Equity side. Nova Scotia’s abolition in the following year saw a thorough attempt to reconcile common law and equity procedure, following models from jurisdictions as far afield as Ohio and New York. (An Act relating to the Administration of Justice in Equity, S N.B. 1854, c. 18; An Act for abolishing the Court of Chancery, and conferring Equity Jurisdiction on the Supreme Court, S.N.S. 1855, c.23.)”

The Jacksonian call from the U.S. for an elected judiciary made no headway within the hallowed halls of Maritime supreme courts, but some cities did flirt with elective municipal courts during this period, based in part on British models of borough governance. Halifax (1841) and Charlottetown (1855) abandoned the appointed grand jury in favour of an elected aldermanic model of governance. Saint John’s charter (1785) still provided for sharing of governance between an elected Common Council and an appointed grand jury. The “mayor’s courts” in these cities exercised both civil and criminal jurisdiction in a wide range of matters, with the mayor presiding and aldermen assisting on a rota basis. These courts and their successors appear sometimes as responsive “people’s courts” in the literature, and at other times as instruments of social control employed by a middle class fearful of the “deviant, disruptive force” represented by the vagrant. All agreed that public order and substantial justice were their primary concerns, rather than the niceties of legal principle or pleading. Blacks were over-represented as defendants in these courts and highly visible in newspaper accounts of their proceedings. Native people were very much underrepresented in both urban and rural courts during this period, and magistrates seemed to have treated them leniently provided they returned to their own communities.

“The institutions of government did not change immediately after the adoption of responsible government, but the franchise attracted much attention. A movement to make the Legislative Council elective—fomented by the Conservatives in a sudden shift to populism while on the opposition benches—petered out except in Prince Edward Island, where it succeeded in 1862. The legislatures became formally more representative with the extension of the franchise in Nova Scotia (1854), New Brunswick (1855), and Prince Edward Island (1853). Zeal for universal male suffrage was tempered by respect for property, however, and an assessment qualification remained in the two larger provinces until well after Confederation; Prince Edward Island adopted a universal male franchise in fact, if not in theory, by giving the vote to all men liable to perform statute labour, including those who would have been liable but for an exemption based on office or occupation. Blacks meeting these qualifications were not formally excluded from the franchise; and they seemed to have exercised it, if the extent of campaigning in Nova Scotia Black communities is any indication. Women were formally excluded from the franchise as part of the agitation leading to responsible government, confirming that the dominant tendency of the period was “to render state privileges more accessible to the average (white male) citizen.”

“A certain openness was also apparent in the presence of women in the early law classes in Saint John and the admission of Black lawyers to the bars of New Brunswick (1882) and Nova Scotia (1900) respectively. Abraham Walker of Saint John had obtained an LL.B. from the National University in Washington, D.C. and became the first Afro-Canadian lawyer, a distinction hitherto wrongly conferred on Delos Davis of Ontario.

(Women were not admitted to Dalhousie Law School until 1915, and the first woman called to the bar in Nova Scotia was Frances Fish in 1918: L.K. Kernaghan, “The Madonna of the Legal Profession” (1991) 16 Hearsay 26. In Prince Edward Island, enabling legislation was passed in 1918, which led to the first woman lawyer in that province a few years later. K. Fisher, “Roma Stewart Blackburn, P.E.I.’s First Woman Lawyer” (1995) ALHW II paper. The second did not follow until 1975. On Walker, see J.B. Cahill, “Walker, Abraham Beverley”, vol. VIII, Dictionary of Canadian Biography (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994). Walker was conspicuously excluded from a dinner for the Saint John bar in 1885, which led to a controversy over the “colour bar.”)

James Robinson Johnston of Halifax had obtained a Bachelor of Letters degree from Dalhousie before graduating LL.B. in 1898; he met with a success which eluded Walker, serving the Black community and specialising in criminal and military law. (Barry Cahill, “The `Colored Barrister’: The Short Life and Tragic Death of James Robinson Johnston, 1876-1915” (1992) 15 Dalhousie Law Journal 6.)

Pierre-Amand Landry became the first Acadian lawyer (1870), the first Acadian named to a county court judgeship (1890) as well as the first Acadian and the first Roman Catholic to be named to the New Brunswick Supreme Court (1893). (D.M. Stanley, A Man for Two Peoples: Pierre-Amand Landry (Fredericton: Law Society of New Brunswick, 1988).)”

Philip Girard, “The Maritime Provinces, 1850-1939: Lawyers and Legal Institutions, 1995” 23 Manitoba Law Journal 379, 1995 CanLIIDocs 142, <https://canlii.ca/t/sgd4>, retrieved on 2021-06-06

The story of Christ Church, Dartmouth

Christ Church as seen at 10:15am, May 31st 1932, looking north from the corner of Ochterloney and Wentworth Streets. https://archives.novascotia.ca/photocollection/archives/?ID=5300

  • When Halifax was first settled, this side of the harbor was the home and hunting ground of the [Mi’kmaq].
  • Soon after the settlement of Halifax, Major Gillman built a saw mill in Dartmouth Cove on the stream flowing from the Dartmouth lakes.
  • On September 30th 1749, [Mi’kmaq] attacked and killed four and captured one out of six unarmed men who were cutting wood near Gillman’s mill.
  • In August 1750, the Alderney, of 504 tons, arrived at Halifax with 353 immigrants, a town was laid out on the eastern side of the harbor in the autumn, given the name of Dartmouth, and granted as the home of these new settlers.
  • A guard house and military fort was established at what is still known as Blockhouse hill [—the hill on King Street, at North].
  • In 1751 [Mi’kmaq] made a night attack on Dartmouth, surprising the inhabitants, scalping a number of the settlers and carrying off others as prisoners.
  • In July 1751, some German emigrants were employed in picketing the back of the town as a protection against the [Mi’kmaq].
  • In 1752, the first ferry was established, John Connor, of Dartmouth, being given the exclusive right for three years of carrying passengers between the two towns.
  • Fort Clarence was built in 1754.
  • In 1758 the first Charles Morris, the Surveyor General, made a return to Governor Lawrence giving a list of the lots in the town of Dartmouth.
  • In 1762 the same Charles Morris wrote: “The Town of Dartmouth, situate on the opposite side of the harbour, has at present two families residing there, who subsist by cutting wood.”
  • In 1785 three brigantines and one schooner with their crews and everything necessary for the whale fishery arrived, and twenty families from Nantucket were, on the invitation of Governor Parr, settled in Dartmouth. These whalers from Nantucket were Quakers in religion. Their fishing was principally in the Gulf of St. Lawrence which then abounded with black whales.
  • In 1788 a common of 150 acres [—200 acres, in keeping with with the New England tradition of “200 acres for a common, sixty acres for a Town Site“, (1808 Toler map overlay) and certain tracts for a meeting house, cemetery, school”] was granted Thomas Cochran, Timothy Folger and Samuel Starbuck in trust for the town of Dartmouth. When these good Quakers left, Michael Wallace, Lawrence Hartshorne, Jonathon Tremaine, all subsequently members of Christ Church, were made trustees [in 1798]. Acts relating to this common were passed in 1841, 1868 and 1872, and the present Dartmouth Park Commission was appointed in 1888.
  • In 1791 the idea of building a canal between the Shubenacadie river and Dartmouth by utilizing the lakes, a plan which originated with Sir John Wentworth, was brought before the legislature. The Shubenacadie Canal company was incorporated in 1826.
  • In 1792 most of the Quakers left Dartmouth. One at least, Seth Coleman, ancestor of the Colemans of today, remained.
  • In early days Lawrence Hartshorne, Johnathon Tremain and William Wilson all Churchmen, carried on grist-mills at Dartmouth Cove. At a ball given by Governor Wentworth on December 20th, 1792, one of the ornaments on the supper table was a reproduction of Messrs. Hartshorne and Tremain’s new flour mill.
  • Many French prisoners of war were brought here off the prizes brought to the port of Halifax. Some were confined in a building near the cove, which now forms part of one of the Mott factories.
  • In 1797 “Skipper” John Skerry began running a public ferry between Halifax and Dartmouth.
  • In 1809 Dartmouth contained 19 houses, a tannery, a bakery and a grist-mill.
  • In 1814 Murdoch relates that “Sir John Wentworth induced Mr. Seth Coleman to vaccinate the poor persons in Dartmouth, and throughout the township of Preston adjoining. He treated over 400 cases with great success.
  • The team boat Sherbrooke made her first trip across the harbor on November 8th, 1816.
  • As already related the first schools in the town were established by the Church of England, the teachers getting salaries, small it is true, from the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. Mary Munn (appointed 1821) was the first teacher of the girls at a salary of £5 a year. William Walker (appointed 1824), father of E.M. Walker, and grandfather of H.R. Walker, now superintendent of Christ Church Sunday School, at £15 year of the boys. Mr. Walker held school in a little half stone house on the site of the present Central School. The S.P.G. was specially anxious for the religion instruction of the children, and the following “Prayers for the use of the Charity Schools in America”, issued by the society were doubtless regularly used by these early teachers.
  • A fire engine company was formed in 1822, a Axe and Ladder Company in 1865, and a Union Protection Company in 1876.
  • Lyle & Chapel opened a shipyard about 1823.
  • In 1828 a steam ferry boat of 30 tons, the Sir Charles Ogle, was built at the shipyard of Alexander Lyle. In 1832 a second steamer, the Boxer, was built; and in 1844 a third, the Micmac.
  • In 1836 the ice business was commenced. William Foster erecting an ice house near the Canal Bridge on Portland Street. The ice was taken in a wheel-barrow to Mr. Foster’s shop in Bedford Row, Halifax, and sold for a penny a pound.
  • In the thirties the industries of Dartmouth included besides the grist mill, of which William Wilson was chief miller, a foundry run by James Gregg on the hill back of the railway station; the manufacture of putty and oils by William Stairs; a tannery kept by Robert Stanford; a tobacco factory; the making of silk hats or “beavers” by Robinson Bros.; a soap chandlery run by Benjamin Elliott opposite Central School, and several ship building plants.
  • It is estimated that altogether $359,951.98 was spent on this canal. The stone locks and parts of the canal are all that remain today.
  • Edward H. Lowe, a leading member of Christ Church, was for many years secretary and manager of the Dartmouth Steamboat Company. At his death he was succeeded by another good Churchman, Captain George Mackenzie, whose wife was a daughter of Rev. James Stewart.
  • The first vessel built in Dartmouth was called the “Maid of the Mill”, and was used in carrying flour from the mill then in full operation.
  • In 1843 Adam Laidlaw, well known as driver of the stage coach between Windsor and Halifax, commenced cutting and storing the ice on a large scale, making this his only business.
  • In 1845 a Mechanics Institute, the first of the kind in Nova Scotia, was formed in Dartmouth.
  • The first regatta ever held on Dartmouth Lake is said to have been that on October 5th, 1846.
  • About 1853 the late John P. Mott commenced his chocolate, spice and soap works.
  • In 1853 the inland Navigation company took over the property and in 1861 a steam vessel of 60 tons, the Avery, went by way of the canal to Maitland and returned to Halifax.
  • In 1856 George Gordon Dustan Esq., purchased “Woodside.” He was much interested in the refining of sugar, and the Halifax Sugar Refinery company was organized with head offices in England, and Mr. Dustan was one of the directions. The first refinery was begun in 1883, and sugar produced in 1884. In 1893 the refinery was transferred to the Acadia Sugar Refinery Company, then just founded.
  • Mount Hope, the Hospital for the insane, was erected between 1856 and 1858, the first physician being in charge being Dr. James R. DeWolfe.
  • About 1860 the Chebucto Marine Railway Company was found by Albert Pilsbury, American Consul at Halifax, who then resided at “Woodside,” four large ships being built by H. Crandall, civil engineer.
  • In 1860 the Dartmouth rifles were organized with David Falconer as captain, and J.W. Johnstone (afterwards Judge) and Joseph Austen as lieutenants.
  • A month later the Dartmouth Engineers with Richard Hartshorne as captain and Thomas A. Hyde and Thomas Synott lieutenants were found.
  • Gold was discovered at Waverly in 1861.
  • In 1862 the whole property and works were sold by the sheriff to a company which was styled “The Lake & River Navigation Company,” which worked the canal for a little time at a small profit. Thousands of pounds were spent on the enterprise.
  • The works of the Starr Manufacturing Company were commenced by John Starr in 1864, associated with John Forbes. At first they made iron nails as their staple products. Mr. Forbes invented a new skate, the Acme, which gained a world-wide reputation, and in 1868 a joint company was formed.
  • In 1869 the Boxer was sold and the old Checbucto also built there, put in her place.
  • In 1868 the firm of Stairs, Son & Morrow decided to commence the manufacture of rope, selected Dartmouth for the site of the industry, erected the necessary buildings and apparatus in the north end of the town, and began the manufacture of cordage in 1869.
  • Dartmouth was incorporated by an act of the Provincial Assembly in 1873 with a warden and six councillors. The first warden was W.S. Symonds, the first councillors, Ward 1 J.W. Johnstone, Joseph W. Allen; Ward 2, John Forbes, William F. Murray; Ward 3, Thomas A. Hyde, Francis Mumford.
  • In 1885 a railway was constructed from Richmond to Woodside Sugar Refinery, with a bridge across the Narrows 650 feet long, which was swept away during a terrific wind and rain storm on Sept. 7th, 1891. A second bridge at the same place was carried away on July 23rd, 1893.
  • In 1886 the railway station was built.
  • In 1888 the Dartmouth (ferry) was built.
  • The present Ferry Commission was appointed on April 17th 1890. It purchased the Arcadia from the citizens committee, and also the Annex 2 of the Brooklyn Annex Line, which was renamed the Halifax. The Steam Ferry Company finally sold out to the Commission, thus terminating an exciting contest between town and company.
  • In 1890 the Halifax and Dartmouth Steam Ferry Company withdrew the commutation rates, and the indignant citizens purchased the Arcadia which carried foot passengers across for a cent, but at a loss.
  • Until 1890 most of the water was obtained from public wells and pumps.
  • In 1891 a Water Commission was formed. E.E. Dodwell, C.E. was appointed engineer, and on November 2nd 1892, our splendid water supply was turned on for the first time.
  • In 1891 a public reading room, believed “to be the only free reading room in the province” at the time, was established near the ferry docks.
  • The old brick post office near the ferry was erected in 1891, the present fine building quite recently.
  • On July 13th 1892, the Dartmouth Electric Light and Power Company began its service.
  • Woodside once had a brickyard and lime kilns, first owned by the late Samuel Prescott. They then passed by purchase to Henry Yeomans Mott, father of John Prescott Mott and Thomas Mott.
  • Mount Amelia was built by the late Judge James William Johnstone.
  • Among the early settlers in Dartmouth was Nathaniel Russell, an American loyalist, who settled near the Cole Harbor Road near Russell Lake. He was the father of Nathaniel Russell, who took so great an interest in the Mechanics Institute, grandfather of Mr. Justice Benjamin Russell, great grandfather of H.A. Russell, one of our progressive citizens of today.
  • The Rev. J.H.D. Browne, now of Santa Monica, California, and editor of the Los Angeles Churchman, who was with the Late Archdeacon Pentreath, one of the founders of Church Work, was born and spent his boyhood in Dartmouth.
  • Captain Ben Tufts was the first settler at Tuft’s Cove.
  • John Gaston, who lived near Maynard’s Lake, drove a horse and milk wagon into Halifax, a two-wheeled conveyance known as “Perpetual Motion”. He is said to have been the first to extend his milk route from this side to Halifax.

Christ Church, interior, view looking NE towards altar from near door, photographed on the afternoon of June 2nd, 1932. https://archives.novascotia.ca/photocollection/archives/?ID=5299

See also:

Christ Church Cemetery

Vernon, C. W. "The story of Christ Church, Dartmouth" [Halifax, N.S.] : publisher not identified , 1917 https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.80672

Resolutions for defining the nature and foundation of the self-government of Nova Scotia in her local affairs, and in favor of an elective legislative council

“…it is of importance that the people of this country should be free from danger. For, sir, without professing a prophetic spirit, let me say that if the principles I am now contending for be not distinctly acknowledged, the time will come when Governors will attempt to exercise the power they now nominally possess, and place themselves in opposition to the wishes of the people.”

Johnston, J. W. “Speech delivered by the Hon. J.W. Johnston, in the House of Assembly, on the 19th March, 1850 : on introducing resolutions for defining the nature and foundation of the self-government of Nova Scotia in her local affairs, and in favor of an elective legislative council” Halifax, N.S. : [s.n.], 1850. https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.18763/1?r=0&s=1

Nova Scotia and Nova Scotians

“Dartmouth, on the opposite side of the safe and spacious harbour, offered an inviting appearance for the formation of a village, and in one year after the foundation of Halifax, some of the company of Lord Cornwallis passed over and commenced a settlement. But a sad catastrophe befell the little town: in six years from its beginning it was destroyed by [Mi’kmaq], who made an irruption upon it from the forest in its rear, destroying with merciless cruelty the inhabitants, demolishing the houses and laying waste the newly tilled lands.”

“Dartmouth was laid even with the ground”

Hill, George W. “Nova Scotia and Nova Scotians” [Halifax, N.S.? : s.n.], 1858 (Halifax, N.S. : J. Bowes) https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.22739/1?r=0&s=1

Law reports : containing decisions of the Bench of the Supreme Court in Nova Scotia between the years 1834 and 1841

“Esson v. Mayberry. Trinity Term, 1841.

The grantee of a water lot, bounded on the shore, is entitled to take up to high-water mark; and that line of his grant changes with the gradual encroachment or retirement of the sea.

…The plantiff derived his title to the land in question through several mesne conveyances, from Mrs. Jane Donaldson. She, it appears, was, in 1818, and previously thereto, in possession of lots Nos. 4, 5 and 6, in division letter W, in the town plot of Dartmouth

Division letter W of the Town plot as seen here in this 1804 property owners map. (https://cityofdartmouth.ca/dartmouth-property-and-owners-in-vicinty-of-dartmouth-cove-lake-and-canal/), which today would be near the area of the ferry terminal and adjacent park.

Thomson, James. “Law reports : containing decisions of the Bench of the Supreme Court in Nova-Scotia between the years 1834 and 1841” [Halifax, N.S.? : s.n.], 1853 (Halifax, N.S. : R. Nugent) https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.67192/1?r=0&s=1

Page 2 of 4
1 2 3 4